|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
Lebanon: nothing left to lose
By Barbara Geary |
| When
Israel and the PLO signed the Declaration of Principles and
the subsequent agreement in Cairo, the door was slammed in the
faces of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians living in Lebanon.
The agreements made no provisions for their future and, their
past a tale of war and grief, they face the present with literally
nothing left to lose. In such a climate, the Palestine Red Crescent
Society in Lebanon is reorganising to meet the needs of its
forgotten people. |
|
Tired. Dejected. Patient. These are the expressions on the
faces of Palestinians living in Lebanon that greet questions
about their life now, some 18 months after the historic signing
of the Declaration of Principles by the State of Israel and
the Palestine Liberation Organisation. The expressions are
not difficult to read nor to understand: politically and financially,
the Palestinians in Lebanon find themselves left out of the
peace picture.
Palestinians have been living in Lebanon for generations
now. They first came, mostly from northern Israel, in 1948
and today an estimated 350,000 Palestinians make up 12.5 per
cent of Lebanon’s population. At least half of them
live in refugee camps which are characteristically overcrowded,
war-torn and very poor. Unlike Palestinians in Jordan, Syria
or Egypt, they enjoy no civil rights and, to a greater extent
than elsewhere, their presence in Lebanon threatens the extremely
delicate balance of power in the country. |
|
|
|
Oslo, the dream thief
If the Palestinians in Lebanon are not proponents of this
peace agreement, it doesn’t mean they are not proponents
of peace. “We were not included in these agreements,”
says Abou Hani who has lived in the Chatila refugee camp in
Beirut since 1950. “It’s difficult to be enthusiastic
about something that excluded you, but to say that we are
not in favour of the peace process doesn’t mean we are
extremists. It doesn’t mean we don’t want peace.
We do want peace, but it should be a just peace. How should
we feel? Before the Oslo agreement, at least we could dream
of returning one day to our homes. The agreement stole our
dreams.”
That also holds true for Palestinians in Jordan, Syria and
the rest of the world. In fact, the Oslo and Cairo agreements
do not treat the matter of Palestinian refugees at all, but
leave it for what is called “permanent status agreements”
originally scheduled to begin three years into the so-called
transitional period which began when Israeli troops left the
Gaza Strip and Jericho. Considering that approximately two-thirds
of the total Palestinian population live outside the occupied
and the autonomous territories, this omission is significant.
The bilateral nature of the peace negotiations does not bode
well for a quick resolution of the Palestinian refugee problem
in Lebanon: with Israel and Lebanon still officially at war
with one another, there is little hope of an agreement between
them in the near future.
Compounding the political disappointments of the Palestinians
in Lebanon is their current financial crisis. Like Palestinians
everywhere, the practical consequence of the Gulf War was
a drying up of the cash flow to and from the PLO. In addition,
the Gulf War cut off an important income source for Palestinians
living in Lebanon whose family members were working in the
Gulf states and sending part of their earnings home. An estimated
95 per cent of Palestinians living in Lebanon are unemployed.
Palestinians in Lebanon enjoy few, if any, civil and political
rights. In 1991, a committee was formed to study the issue
of civil rights for Palestinians, but its work was quickly
suspended. Among other reasons, it was discontinued so as
not to pre-empt the outcome of the peace process — an
ironic twist for those who hoped peace would improve their
everyday life. |
|
Against the odds
In this political and financial climate, the Palestine Red
Crescent Society in Lebanon (PRCS/L) is struggling to exist
and to meet the needs of both Palestinians and Lebanese who
have no other means of obtaining health care.
Living conditions for many Palestinians in Lebanon are unhealthy.
Overcrowding, inadequate sanitation facilities and a general
lack of basic infrastructure threaten large numbers. According
to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine
Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), up to 300,000 Palestinians
are not receiving adequate medical care.
UNRWA is responsible for providing health care to those Palestinians
registered as refugees, but many Palestinians do not fall
into this category. Some estimates put the figure of unregistered
refugees as high as 150,000. In addition, UNRWA concentrates
on the provision of primary health care, leaving a gap that
is being filled by PRCS/L in the area of specialised treatment
and hospital care that also extends to Lebanese. Some 40 per
cent of the people treated by PRCS/L are poor Lebanese.
In Lebanon, the PRCS is a child of war. As a result, it has
a solid reputation for emergency care and it runs 15 health
care facilities scattered throughout the country. Its staff
numbers about 900. But peace and its problems have meant a
near collapse of PRCS activities here.
“Our resources are completely depleted,” Dr Mohammed
Osman, head of the PRCS in Lebanon, explains. “We used
to receive funding from the PLO, but that stopped in 1993.
People here are not able to pay for the true cost of services
and we’ve lost staff because we are not always able
to meet salary requirements. Our salaries are below the minimum
wage which is US$ 150 a month here. If it wasn’t for
the help we recently received through the Federation, we would
not be functioning at all.”
|
|
| |
Preventing
tragedy
In June 1994, the Federation requested 1.2 million Swiss
francs to strengthen three PRCS/L health centres: Al Hamshary
hospital in Saida, Chatila polyclinic and A’kka diagnostic
centre in Beirut. The support includes the provision of medical
supplies, equipment and running costs, as well as selected
renovations. In addition, the Federation and PRCS/L are in
the process of rationalising PRCS services so that they better
reflect peacetime conditions.
“Some of our health centres will close and others will
be strengthened and specialised so we can use our resources
more efficiently,” Dr Osman explains.
The Federation’s request for assistance has been met
in part by National Societies in Canada, Germany, Japan, Norway,
the UK and the USA. The aid has been received with extreme
gratitude. “It is because of those National Societies
that we are standing on our feet today,” Dr Osman says.
Zacharias Backer, head of the Federation’s delegation
in Beirut, stresses that the need for assistance is short
term but critical. “The PRCS in Lebanon is in a unique
position to fill a well-defined need that no other organisation
can,” Backer says. “By co-operating with UNRWA,
the PRCS can provide the hospital care so badly needed by
Palestinians and Lebanese alike. But, if they don’t
have some help in the next two years to put them back on their
feet, 350,000 Palestinians will certainly develop into a permanent
humanitarian problem.”
|
Barbara Geary
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Top | Contact
Us | Credits
| Webmaster

© 2003 | Copyright
|
|